EchoRecorder vs Loom

The cost difference is not subtle

Loom Business costs $15 per user per month, billed annually. That's the plan most teams actually need — it removes recording limits and adds analytics. At 25 people, that's $375/month or $4,500/year. EchoRecorder Team is $29/month flat. The entire team. No per-seat math.

Loom also removed Creator Lite free seats in 2026. Users who previously had 10 paid seats + dozens of free viewers now pay per head for everyone. Teams that thought they were paying $240/year discovered they owed $1,500+.

Loom pricing per loom.com, March 2026. EchoRecorder pricing per getechorecorder.com.

Feature by feature

We've tried to be accurate and fair here, including rows where Loom wins or ties. If anything is wrong, email us and we'll fix it.

When Loom is the better choice

• •Your team lives inside the Atlassian ecosystem (Jira, Confluence) and the native integration matters more than price.
• •You need mobile recording apps — iOS and Android.
• •Background noise suppression and virtual backgrounds are table-stakes for your team.
• •You need SOC 2 compliance or SCIM provisioning today — we don't have these yet.
• •You need transcript-based editing (cut by editing text) — Loom has this, we don't.

When EchoRecorder is the better choice

• •Your team has more than 10 people and you don't want to do per-seat math.
• •You need recordings to live under your brand, not Loom's — especially for customer-facing content.
• •You want AI documentation that generates step-by-step guides from what's actually on screen — not just a text summary.
• •Your QA or CS team needs click event capture with DOM context — no other tool does this.
• •You want to bring your own S3 bucket and OpenAI key (Business plan) — data stays on your infrastructure.
• •You're evaluating after Atlassian's 2026 pricing changes removed Creator Lite free seats and your bill tripled.